Should racing be more standardized?

[ken]

This is a very general topic but is there caertain thing you would like to see more standardized in racing? I'm talking about drom track-to-track and circuit-to-circuit. For example, I think areas that are too diverse are track layout, race conditions, drug testing, penalties, timing of all runners, online betting.
In Ca, you are limited to betting services you are allowed to use; fair tracks are vwry different from one another; there are complaints about inconsistent penalties on trainers; and of course, simple technology exists to record times of ALL runners but are not used. Anyone have comments or other areas to standardize?

[Sir Francis Bacon]

I agree with you

[MissDeeJaeDeNiro]

i think they should be more standardized to an extent. i dont think all tracks should be exactly the same. they need to be differnt in some ways.

[ken]

i think they should be more standardized to an extent. i dont think all tracks should be exactly the same. they need to be differnt in some ways.
Of course, That is a big wish considering the layout is set!
In Ca there are tracks ranging from 3/4 to 1 1/8 mile. I find it very hard to handicap the small "bullrings"!