PDA

View Full Version : Ruffian the Movie


FastG45
06-10-2007, 08:16 AM
Ruffian romantic faithful to his turf
June 10, 2007 By Columnists Les Payne (http://www.newsday.com/news/columnists/ny-lespayne,0,3156301.columnist?coll=ny-news-columnists)


Bill Nack was not yet the great turf writer when I came upon him polishing the toe of his boot in a barracks in Saigon. The magic of the prose in a letter Nack wrote to MACV (Military Assistance Command, Vietnam) led me to divert him from his up-country post, where the sword was mightier than the word, to Saigon, where he could help run Gen. William Westmoreland's command newspaper.
Even as the senseless war raged around us, Nack emitted signs of being the consummate historian on horse racing. He could recite the first-, second- and third-place finisher in every Kentucky Derby since 1875. And in the misty hours, with Johnny Walker Red Label falling like rain, the hours when men in battle get out photographs of their wives and lovers, Nack would pull his wallet from his rear pocket and publicly ogle 2-by-3 snapshots of Swaps and Nashua.
The duo captured Nack's heart when they had met in the 1955 Derby, with Swaps winning, and in a match race later that year, with Nashua besting his undefeated rival. The son of a writer for the Racing Form in Chicago, Nack had his own affection for horses planted at age 12 when his parents bought him a parade horse named Bandit, and it sprouted during the summers he worked at the track as a hot walker and a groom.

The match race was very much on Nack's mind recently when we had coffee at a shop near his gracious home in Washington, D.C. With the '06 Derby breakdown of Barbaro piquing interest, Nack brought his art to bear on the case of a filly of the early '70s.

"Ruffian: A Racetrack Romance," Nack's 35,000-word book-essay, is selling as a companion to the namesake ABC movie he worked on as a consultant and appears in; actor Frank Whaley portrays Nack. With the vernacular of a veterinarian, Nack explained how he dashed across the Belmont Park infield when Ruffian broke down. He almost got brushed by her match-race challenger, Foolish Pleasure.

In addition to the fractured sesamoids in Ruffian's ankle, Nack described the curmudgeonly trainer, Frank Whiteley (Sam Shepard in the movie), as he had written of him in Newsday. It does not surprise me that along with the owners of Ruffian's trademark, Whiteley and the jockey Jacinto Vasquez - who both refused ESPN's offer to contribute to the effort - are suing the producers and the owner of ABC.

As a docudrama, alerting viewers to a general massaging of the facts, the film leaves an opening for the Ruffian camp to charge, as admitted, that ABC's true-to-life account is fictionalized. What surprises is not so much that Nack's role is said to be exaggerated - actors can do this - but rather that the complaint of the Ruffian camp suggests trainer Whiteley, now 92, didn't converse with Nack back in the '70s.

Nack had numerous contacts on the record with Whiteley, starting in 1974, when Nack had written his classic "Secretariat: The Making of a Champion," and was considered an established turf writer working for Newsday. Nack can't speak about the active court case, and while he is one of my best friends, I must say that the hints against him are patently ridiculous.

To appreciate Nack's execution of his craft as a reporter, quite apart from his head for cold facts and his heart for horses, one must consider his taste in role models and his will to be perfect on his own. He is an impeccable stickler for facts and honesty. As for his art, the prose style is spun off the looms of Fitzgerald, Nabokov and Mencken, the meter he composed from poets such as Yeats, Eliot and Thomas Wolfe.

Nack is legendary in some circles for quoting long, verbatim passages from prose writers, the last few pages of "The Great Gatsby," for example. In the early days, at least, he used to read aloud his prose, tapping out the measured beat with his right hand thumping on his chest.

He seldom missed a beat or misspelled a name and would never fabricate a non-existing relationship on his sacred turf.


My Comment: I don’t really care who is right or wrong and I don’t know all the facts. I’m not taking sides with ABC, ESPN, Nack, Whiteley or Vasquez although ESPN approached Whiteley and Vasquez several years ago to obtain the rights to use their stories in the film and they said no and ABC went and made it anyway. I rarely watch TV but I watched the Ruffian Movie last night and I found it to be one of the best if not the best films on horse racing I have ever seen even if it is partially true, though I believe it to be fairly accurate. The story was portrayed absolutely beautifully and a tear jerker as well. There are not enough superlatives in the dictionary to describe how luxuriously fine this filly was and her record speaks for itself.

http://www.championsgallery.com/Ruffian/fi/00000012.jpg (http://www.championsgallery.com/Ruffian/Ruffian.html)




She was never defeated, and never headed. She set or equaled a new stakes record in every one of the eight stakes races she won. She raced at distances from 5 1/2 furlongs to 1 1/2 miles with an average winning margin of 8 1/3 lengths. She was queen of the track, and everyone knew it.

elwood
06-10-2007, 11:06 AM
I do not blame Frank Whiteley or Jacinto Vasquez for suing ABC. Hollywood and ABC showed a total disrespect by making this movie without consent of those closest to Ruffian.
There is a big difference between a movie and a documenuary. As a movie hollywood has to make it entertaining by adding a lot of untruths---it leaves the viewer with a false impression. On the other hand this should have been a documenuary with interviews and highlights which would have given respect to Ruffian and those who knew her best. So, if hollywood wanted to make a movie they should have changed all the names and just made an entertaing movie about a race horse.

clusterf1
06-10-2007, 11:17 AM
I was a big opponent of the race at the time I was worried that one or the other may injure themselves and sure enough we lost the greatest fillie that ever set foot on a race track.
The loss left me so upset that I did not go to the track for almost 2 years. I hope that the NYRA and CBS got there pound of flesh that they so badly wanted to bring people back to the track . it took Aladar and Affirmed to get me back to the track.


Clusterf1

Mister Sanderson
06-11-2007, 04:37 PM
i was suprised that they actually showed the bone breaking. Other than that, it was uninspiring as a whole, Im sure uninspiring to the lucky ones who got to see her run. I don't think they do any epic or documentary style movie justice unless the almost exactly follow the storyline, and they didn't in here. The American public wants juice, and they sold out and juiced it up. Just like the rest of the garbage we see on TV (reality TV ie) and movies. Patience and info seeking aren't are greatest virtue as a consumer. NBC ABC etc etc isn't gonna feed us asparaghus (spelling??) when they know we're hooked on chocolate.

deltasports
06-11-2007, 07:13 PM
I do not blame Frank Whiteley or Jacinto Vasquez for suing ABC. Hollywood and ABC showed a total disrespect by making this movie without consent of those closest to Ruffian.
There is a big difference between a movie and a documenuary. As a movie hollywood has to make it entertaining by adding a lot of untruths---it leaves the viewer with a false impression. On the other hand this should have been a documenuary with interviews and highlights which would have given respect to Ruffian and those who knew her best. So, if hollywood wanted to make a movie they should have changed all the names and just made an entertaing movie about a race horse.
================================================== =======
YES..I AGREE WITH ELWOOD...I KNOW JACINTO WHEN HE & JORGE V CAME TO THIS COUNTRY IN 1964.I SAT WITH THE BOTH OF THEM IN SWEENYS" IN BALTIMORE & THEY PROMISED THRU AN INTERPRETER TO OBEY ALL THE RULES AND BE AN UPSTANDING PERSON IN THEIR FIELD.THE INTERPRETER WAS ANGEL VALENZUELA (MILO'S OLDER BROTHER & P.VALS UNCLES.)I KNOW THESE GUYS AND I VOUCH FOR THEM..SAME THING WITH JOSE SANTOS.TRUE & STRAIGHT AS AN ARROW.I SAW HIM IN THE PADDOCK WHEN WE WENT IN FOR THE BELMONT & HE THANKED ME AGAIN FOR STANDING UP FOR HIM BACK IN 1985..THERE IS SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT WRIT'ERS WHO MAKE MOVIES..I WAS IN THE SEABISCUIT MOVIE THAT WAS SHOT AT SANTA ANITA.THEY HAD SO MANY FALSES & MISTAKES IT WAS A JOKE..THE BOOK WAS VERY GOOD..NOT THE MOVIE..

FastG45
10-09-2008, 09:14 PM
You might not like the movie "Ruffian" or you might love it but it made the list of the top tear jerker sports movies.

Check out this article and vote or blog your opinion.

http://www.sportsline.com/spin/story/11017465